shaming the abolitionists?

General George H. Thomas, U.S.A. (between 1860 and 1875; LOC: LC-DIG-cwpbh-00679)

General Thomas sent good news from Nashville

A Democrat publication wondered why, if over two million adult men voted for President Lincoln’s re-election, the President had to threaten a draft to come up with 300,000 more soldiers.

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in 1864 or early 1865:

Three Hundred Thousand More!

Notwithstanding the assurances given us by the abolition press of the country that the re-election of Mr. Lincoln, would result in immediate peace to the nation, and the consequent disbanding of our armies, the President finds it necessary to call for 300,000 more men. The demand is for volunteers to serve for one, two or three years. In case quotas are not filled by the 15th day of February next, a draft will take place to fill up all deficiencies. The President complains in his proclamation, that but 280,000 men were realized by his last call for 500,000 – partly owing to “credits allowed, in accordance with the act of Congress,” and partly on account of “the action of the enemy in certain States,” which rendered it impossible to procure from such States their assigned quotas.

We think this call for more men will not come unexpectedly to the mass of our people. The Administration has been laboring as earnestly since election to prepare the public mind for it, as as its organs did previously to divest the minds of the voters of the country of any such apprehensions, as an inducement for them to cast their ballots for Mr. Lincoln.

General Sherman's army entering Savannah, Georgia, December 21, 1864 (Illus. in: Harper's Weekly, 1865 January 14, p. 17; LOC:  LC-USZ6-1548)

“General Sherman’s army entering Savannah, Georgia, December 21, 1864”

Such news, says the New York World, in refering [sic] to this subject, as we have just received from SHERMAN and THOMAS we should have supposed might have led the administration to rely on the noble and spontaneous enthusiasm of the people. If there be any honesty in the boasted ‘patriotism’ of the Loyal Leagues, any meaning in the clamorous ‘loyalty’ of the Tribune’s ‘nine hundred thousand’ men of New England, let them now be proved! To arms! The country waits to hear your martial tramp upon a thousand roads. – Volunteers! You have demanded a policy of uncompromising war! Shame, a thousand times shame upon you, if you render to that policy only the compulsory service expected by a remorseless conscription!

Apparently, back in 1862 the Tribune claimed 900,000 men would volunteer if President Lincoln issued an emancipation proclamation.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Lincoln Administration, Northern Politics During War, Northern Society | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hardee not Lincoln

When a Richmond paper heard the news about the fall of Savannah, it spun it positive – unlike American forces in Charleston during the Revolutionary War, General Hardee’s army escaped. From the Richmond Daily Dispatch December 29, 1864:

Thursday morning…December 29, 1864.

The capture of Savannah has not yielded the Yankees all the fruits they anticipate from that enterprise. They believed that Hardee would shut himself up in that city, with fifteen thousand men, and wait the event of a siege, which could not be doubtful since they have the command of the sea. They even anticipated the capture of Beauregard, with his forces; and their journals made themselves quite merry on the occasion.–They expected, in a word, another Vicksburg and Port Hudson affair at Savannah. But they have been disappointed. Hardee did not remain to be captured. He carried off all his men, all his magazines, and all his munitions of war. He left only his siege guns, which were too heavy to be transported, and which were, no doubt, rendered unfit for service. Every man, well or sick, was transported beyond the reach of Sherman. The army has been saved, and will add to our troops in the field a force of which they are in much need.–In the Revolutionary war, the American general — Lincoln — committed the folly of shutting himself up in Charleston with the entire army destined to defend the South. The consequences might have been foreseen. The enemy, having the entire command of the sea, shut up the harbor of Charleston, and landing forces at Beaufort, invested it by land. The city not only fell, but it carried the army along with it. Every man was captured, and the Southern States left entirely without an army. It was then that the spirit of the people rose to supply the place of a regular army. It was then that Marion, Sumpter and Clarke first began to teach the British that though they had conquered Savannah and Charleston, they had not conquered South Carolina and Georgia. The dispatch from Sir Henry Clinton to Lord George Germania, the British Secretary of War, announcing that South Carolina was completely subdued, had hardly been published in the Gazette, when news arrived that these bold partizans had already rekindled the war. Cornwallis, like Sherman, commenced his march northward. He overthrew the army of Gates at Camden, and, for awhile, put an end to all regular opposition. But Marion and Sumpter were still at work, and in less than two months after Camden, came King’s Mountain; and in three months more, the defeat of Tarlton at the Cowpens by Morgan’s regulars and militia. We are more fortunate than were our forefathers. They lost Charleston, and with it a whole army. We have simply lost Savannah, which had been blockaded and rendered useless for two years. The army is safe, intact, and existing, to serve as a nucleus around which reinforcements may rally.

The column which Sherman has sent to the South is supposed to have gone in search of the prisoners, which, thus far, he has failed to capture. We do not think he is likely to find them. With his main force he is already moving north; his object being, no doubt, to pass through South and North Carolina, and, as far as he can, destroy all the communications between those regions and General Lee’s army. It appears to be thought by many that the winter, and the bad weather, will impede his advance to unite with Grant. We are not of that opinion — at least, we place no great faith in such allies as wind and weather. They have proved treacherous too often since the commencement of this war. Besides, we read that in the campaign of JanuaryFebruary, 1781, between Cornwallis and Green — over this same ground — the rains and the high water did, by no means, put an end to military evolutions. Cornwallis pursued Green, and Green retired before him with the most unremitting vigilance, and the most untiring activity, although it was raining incessantly nearly the whole time, and the waters were everywhere up, for several weeks, from the borders of South Carolina, into Virginia. We rather hope that military means will be found to hold Sherman in check, and to protect the country and delay his advance as much as possible.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Military Matters | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

reconstruction bill

Great mass meeting to endorse the call of the Legislature of South Carolina for a state convention to discuss the question of secession from the Union, held at Institute Hall, Charleston, S.C., on Monday, Nov. 12, 1860 (Illus. in: Frank Leslie's illustrated newspaper, vol. 11, no. 261 (1860 Nov. 24), pp. 8-9; LOC: LC-USZ62-62193)

“Great mass meeting to endorse the call of the Legislature of South Carolina for a state convention to discuss the question of secession from the Union, held at Institute Hall, Charleston, S.C., on Monday, Nov. 12, 1860” (Library of Congress)

Four years to the day after South Carolina officially seceded from the United States, Richmond citizens could read about a bill in the Yankee Congress to manage the return of the rebel states: slavery would be forever abolished; provisional governors would enforce U.S. and antebellum state laws; high level Confederate military officers would not be citizens of the United States. From the Richmond Daily Dispatch December 20, 1864:

“reconstruction” of the Confederate States.

The bill for “reconstructing” the Governments of the “rebellious States” was introduced in the Federal Congress on Friday. We find the following summary of its provisions in the Tribune:

It provides for the appointment by the President of provisional governors of rebel States, who shall see that the laws of the United States and of the States before the rebellion are enforced. But no law or usage recognizing slavery shall be recognized by any officer or court in such State. It emancipates all slaves in such State and their posterity forever, and provides for the discharge, on habeas corpus, of persons held to service on pretence of ownership.

nterior of Secession Hall  (December 1860; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-19336)

Charleston’s Secession Hall, December 1860

It provides for the punishment of attempts to re-enslave emancipated persons. It declares that officers of the rank of colonel, or higher, in the rebel service, are not citizens of the United States. The bill further provides for the calling of conventions in States whose governments have been usurped and overthrown as soon as the military resistance to the United States shall have been suppressed and the people shall have sufficiently returned to their allegiance. The conventions are required to provide that persons in rebel civil and military service of, and above, the grade of colonel, shall not vote for, or be, a member of the Legislature or Governor.

Involuntary servitude is prohibited, and the freedom of all persons to be guaranteed in the said States. No debt, State or Confederate, created by the usurping power is to be recognized. If the convention shall refuse to re-establish the State government upon the above conditions, the provisional government is to declare it dissolved, and another election of delegates is to be ordered.

On December 20, 1864 everyone North and South knew that Sherman’s Union army was closing in on another hotbed of secession:

The first flag of independence raised in the South, by the citizens of Savannah, Ga. November 8th, 1860 (Savannah, Ga. : s.n., 1860; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-19610)

“The first flag of independence raised in the South, by the citizens of Savannah, Ga. November 8th, 1860” (Library of Congress)

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Northern Politics During War | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

2 + 2

As Democrat paper in the Finger Lakes region of New York State absorbed a couple of the significant events that occurred 150 years this week – the Union victory at Nashville and President Lincoln’s call for 300,000 more volunteers – it came up with some doubt about how well the war was really going for the North. From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in December 1864:

Battle of Nashville (by Kurz & Allison, c1891.; LOC:  LC-DIG-pga-01886)

“rose-colored dispatches” ?

The Battle at Nashville.

The recent battle near Nashville seems to have been very disastrous to the enemy. Gen. Thomas attacked Hood and succeeded in driving him back beyond Franklin, a distance of some miles. From all the accounts received the enemy lost most of his artillery, and one fourth of his effective strength. Too much reliance, however, must not be placed on the rose-colored dispatches from that vicinity. There is no doubt but that the rebels were signally defeated, but we do not believe that Hood’s army is used up, or destroyed even for the time being. The battle, unquestionably, was a severe one, and our own loss heavy. It is reported at from three to four thousand. The enemy must have lost heavily in prisoners, if not in killed and wounded.

The sensation dispatches of victory from every quarter, must be taken with great allowance, for it is a significant fact that upon the heels of nearly all of our great victories – or reported such – comes a conscription. The back-bone of the Confederacy may be effectually broken, and it may require only a few more men – just a few more at this particular time – to disperse and utterly route the rebel armies, and possibly it may require years, and a dozen calls of 300,000 men, to finish a task deemed so trifling by our Abolition friends. No one, we venture to say, except the most ignorant of our opponents, can be made to believe that this is the last call for men.

______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________

171 years ago today Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol was first published.

Scrooge and marley's ghost

A Scrooge is born …

Scrooge and Cratchit

and reborn

titlepage 1843

12-19-1843

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Lincoln Administration, Military Matters | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

exterminate them!

A Seneca County, New York newspaper in 1864 said it was skeptical about reports of the horrible conditions in Southern prison camps – until it spoke with a couple native sons who had survived the experience:

RETURNED PRISONERS. Lieut. CORT. VAN RENSSELAER and Sergt. CHARLES B. RANDOLPH, of the 148th, who were taken prisoners by the rebels last Summer, arrived home a few days since, having been paroled for exchange. The former was last confined at Columbia , S.C. and the latter at Andersonville, Georgia. Both confirm the statements which have been published of the barbarous and inhuman treatment received by the prisoners at the hands of those who have charge of them, and they say that half of the truth has not been told concerning the horrors of the prison-pens at the South. It is no wonder that so large a number die in these prisons, but is a wonder that so many survive the brutality that they have to suffer from those who seem lost to all feelings of humanity, and whose barbarities are not exceeded even by savages. People can hardly give credence to the printed statements they read describing the treatment of Union prisoners, but when they come to hear from the lips of the poor sufferers themselves what they have endured during their captivity, there will be a feeling of terrible indignation aroused throughout the North, and the avenging cry will go forth, not to be hushed until every Union captive is set at liberty, and their fiendish tormentors exterminated from the earth.

From the 148th roster at the New York State Military Museum:

Cortland Van Rensselaer

Cortland Van Rensselaer

Charles B. Randolph (NY 148th)

Charles B. Randolph (NY 148th)

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Civil War prisons, Northern Society | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

prison necrology

From The New-York Times December 17 1864:

THE PRISON PENS IN THE SOUTH; Necrology of the Union Captives. The Dead at Savannah, at Florence and at Andersonville. Leaves from a Diary Kept at Florence, South Carolina. Glimpses of Life in the Hospital and Life in the Stockade.

FLAG-OF-TRUCE STEAMER NEW-YORK, OFF FORT SUMTER, CHARLESTON. S.C., Monday, Dec. 12, 1864.

In fulfillment of the promise made in the closing paragraph of my last letter, I send herewith a long list of names of the soldiers deceased at Savannah, Florence and Andersonville. I have no heart, for the present at least, to write further details of the revolting cruelties practiced upon our captives in the South, and shall thus spare your readers for a time the perusal of what must be a dismal, soul-sickening record. Surely the facts already presented have been convincing enough even for the most charitably inclined persons, to believe that the deliberate charge of “barbarity” I have made against the rebel authorities was founded in truth.

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Civil War prisons, Northern Society | Tagged , | Leave a comment

unrepentant

trap-door style

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in December 1864:

A DESERTER named “French Bill” was hung at Harper’s Ferry a short time ago. The gallows was one of the old fashioned kind, with trap-door, &c. Three thousand soldiers witnessed the sight. The culprit made a speech, in which he said he would pursue the same course under the same circumstances, if he could escape; although “life was sweet to all,” he was not afraid to die; that he was twenty years of age, and his face was the same then as fifteen years since; he died “a Southorn [sic] soldier, a brave man and a christian.” His hands and feet were then bound, the noose adjusted, and the cap placed over his head. A gauntlet was dropped to the ground as a signal, and the Assistant Provost Marshal immediately severed the rope sustaining the trap, when “Bill” fell some four feet, breaking the rope in his descent, falling to the ground. The Provost Marshal immediately ordered four men to carry him to the platform; the rope was knotted, and he was again hung, the whole operation from the time of the breaking of the rope to the final hanging of the culprit not occupying over a minute and a half.

I’m a couple weeks late with this story. The Wheeling Daily Intelligencer (at West Virginia Archives) reported the story on December 8th. How could a Southern man desert from a union regiment? He did not exactly desert to help his wife and kids harvest their crops. According to Google Books[1] he was a recent immigrant from France who joined a New York regiment after the war started. He deserted to Mobly’s [Mobley’s] band and “became a terror to the people of Loudoun [County].” Earlier this month the National Park Service commemorated William Loge’s December 2, 1864 hanging – exactly two years after John Brown was hung following his raid on Harper’s Ferry. A couple of John Brown’s accomplices were hung a couple weeks later:

The Execution of Cook and Coppock ... [Charlestown, W. Va., Dec. 17, 1859; panoramic view of soldiers surrounding gallows from which 2 of the Harper's Ferry Raiders are hanging]

“The Execution of Cook and Coppock … [Charlestown, W. Va., Dec. 17, 1859; panoramic view of soldiers surrounding gallows from which 2 of the Harper’s Ferry Raiders are hanging]” (Library of Congress)

  1. [1]Barry, Joseph The Annals of Harper’s Ferry: With Sketches of Its Founder, and Many Prominent Characers Connected with Its History, Anecdotes, &c. Harper’s Ferry: “Berkeley Union”, 1872. Print. page 86.
Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Military Matters, Northern Society | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“Yankee exploding ball”

From the Richmond Daily Dispatch December 15, 1864:

Accident from fire-arms.

–Yesterday afternoon, a little free negro boy, named Lewis Harris, was seriously injured in one of his hands by the explosion of a Yankee exploding ball, in the Second Market. He had the missile in his hand and was pecking carelessly against a fire-plug, when the accident occurred, making a noise equal to that of a heavy musket discharge, and creating much alarm in the neighborhood.

This sounds like it might be something like a hand grenade, which made History’s list of “8 Unusual Civil War Weapons”. Buffalo’s William F. Ketchum patented a dart-like design, which you can see at the Smithsonian

Richmond 1864

explosion at Second Market (Marshall and 6th)

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Confederate States of America, Southern Society | Tagged , | Leave a comment

leaden sky ledger

Richmond, Petersburg, and vicinity Genl. Grant's campaign war map 1864 (LOC: http://www.loc.gov/item/001-ocm19089315/)

“defensive lines and cautious policies “?

As a Richmond paper tallied the military balance sheet for 1864, the conclusion was inescapable – the South had had a great year.

From a Seneca County, New York newspaper in 1864:

The Military Account Current Between North and South for 1864 – Alleged Large Ballance [sic] in Favor of the Rebels.

The military balance sheet for 1864 will be greatly in favor of the Confederate states. If results had only shown an equipose [sic] as between the two beligerants [sic], the advantage would have been nevertheless largely with us; because, with the enemy, mere failure is disaster and defeat, while to us to hold our ground is a victory. They have set out to accomplish a great positive result. It is not to be attained by defensive lines and cautious policies and negative advantages. These are all on the side of their adversaries. When they make no advance, they are retrograding. Delay does not merely disappoint and dispirit them, it undermines their strength. Each day they become weaker, so severely have they strained their resources, and so vast and rapidly increasing is the debt they have incurred.

General Grant's headquarters at City Point, Va. (photographed between 1861 and 1865, printed between 1880 and 1889; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-33024)

Little Mac could have gotten this far (“General Ulysses S. Grant at City Point in 1864 with his wife and son Jesse.”)

But we have done more than maintain ourselves. We have inflicted positive as well as negative blows. In Virginia we have lost nothing, while we have destroyed a host of our enemies. Grant might probably have gained his present position as a starting point for his campaign. He has been driven there by necessity; but his army has melted away in the Wilderness, and at the close of the campaign, with nothing accomplished he is begging for men to fill the places of the multitude he has lost. In the trans-Mississippi States, we have gained astonishly [sic], and the invaders have been almost entirely destroyed or driven off. In Georgia, the campaign is still afoot, and the result undecided, but we have hope of closing the year without damage, as compared with its commencement.

herman's march from Atlanta to the sea. Drawn from official map of Brig. Genl. O. M. Poe, Chief Engineer. (by Robert Knox Sneden; LOC: http://www.loc.gov/item/gvhs01.vhs00040/)

“In Georgia, the campaign is still afoot”

While such are the military results of the year now closing, as to its leading operations, are enemies have, indeed, constantly claimed victories. Secretary Stanton’s war bulletins, if the fourth of what they declared were true, have announed [sic] successes sufficient in magnitude and number to have ended half a dozen wars; but the striking commentary upon them all is, that his armies have made no advance, or have been driven, and he is farther from conquest now, when the sky is again leaden and wintry, than when the spring of 1864 first gave us its smiles. The deceptions which he has practiced in the particular instances are now made manifest and palpable by the aggregate result. As no array of victories could add up a defeat, so the unfavorable position in which President Lincoln finds his fortunes, at the close of the campaign, exposes the frauds by which his people have been constantly assured of their prosperous progress.

Harpers Weekly 12-17-1864 robbing-cradle


ROBBING THE CRADLE AND THE GRAVE.
SOUTHERN MATRON. “Well, father, you’ve got to go, I see. JEFF DAVIS had better take little PETE along too. You’d both be jest the age for two soldiers. You’re sixty-nine years old, and he’s one. That’s zactly thirty-five on an avridg.”

All have not been deceived. There are some who, convinced of the folly of his undertaking, and the impossibility of subjugating a people so numerous, and in a territory so vast, have scrutinized the stories of victory and triumph, and compared them with the developments that followed. They have seen great drafts follow on the heels of great victories. They have seen the demoralized and despairing rebels, after having been scattered to the winds a dozen times, swiftly falling upon their foes and inflicting defeat. They have been promised the immediate capture of Richmond times innumerable; but they have never seen it captured. “More men – five hundred thousand more men” – is the word they get from Grant after a series of battles, in every one of which he had inflicted enormous losses and a crushing defeat on the rebels, and which had driven them to the last ditch and to a robbery of the cradle and the grave. They want to hear him announce the fall of Richmond, but instead of this there comes the demand for vast re-enforcements and renewed supplies.

Hannibal Barca counting the rings of the Roman knights killed at the Battle of Cannae (216 BC). Marble, 1704. (by Sébastien Slodtz at Musée du Louvre)

Hannibal Barca counting the rings of the Roman knights killed at the Battle of Cannae (216 BC).

Hannibal’s enterprise against Rome was very strongly opposed by Hanno, a prominent Senator of Carthage. The wonderful successes which at first attended the Carthagenian arms produced no change in his sentiments. After the great victory at Cannae, Hannibal sent Carthage a bushel of gold rings, taken from the fingers of the Roman nobility that fell in the battle. He accompanied his glowing accounts of his triumphs by a request for re-enforcements. Carthage was thrown into an ecstasy of joy by the glad news, and Hanno was reproached by a Senator of the opposition party who asked him if he still opposed Hannibal and the war. Hanno answered “that the victories they vaunted of, supposing them real, could give him joy only in proportion as they should be made subservient to an advantageous peace; but he was necessarily of the opinion that the mighty exploits of which they boasted so much were chimerical and imaginary. [‘]I have twice seized the enemy’s camp, full of provisions of all kinds; send me provisions and money.’ – Could he have talked otherwise had he lost his camp? He tells us the Romans have made no proposals of peace, from which I perceive that we are no farther advanced than when Hannibal first landed in Italy,” Thus spoke Hanno, and his conclusion was that Hannibal should be re-enforced, and that the war should be abandoned. – Richmond Sentinel.

The Sentinel did not appear too concerned about the idea of total war – it mentioned the trans-Mississippi but not the Shenandoah Valley.

The political cartoon appeared in the December 17, 1864 issue of Harper’s Weekly, which we can read thanks to Son of the South.

agnus' historical war map. One hundred & fifty miles around Richmond.  (New York, Washington, Charles Magnus, [1864] ; LOC: http://www.loc.gov/item/99446360/)

bullseye Richmond? (150 miles around Richmond, 1864 http://www.loc.gov/item/99446360/)

Posted in 150 Years Ago This Month, Confederate States of America, Military Matters, Southern Society | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

no relief

Secretary of State William H. Seward was not going to let the British distribute aid to rebels in Union prison camps. From the Richmond Daily Dispatch December 12, 1864:

The British Relief Fund for Confederate prisoners — Seward Refuses to Allow its Distribution.

Charles_Francis_Adams

Mr. Adams received instructions from Secretary Seward

Lincoln, on Thursday, sent a message to the Senate in reply to Mr. Sumner’s resolution calling upon him to furnish any information in his possession relative to a proposition of British subjects to give aid to the rebellion. Lord Wharncliffe informs Mr. Adams that the Liverpool Bazaar produced about £17,000, and asks permission for an accredited agent to visit the military prisons within the Northern States and distribute aid to their inmates. He denies that any political aid is aimed at, or any imputation that Confederate prisoners are deprived of such attentions as the ordinary rules enjoin. He says:

“The issue of the great contest will not be determined by individual suffering, be it greater or less; and you, whose family name is interwoven with American history, cannot view with indifference the suffering of American citizens, whatever their State or opinions.”

Mr. Adams replied that it has never been the desire of the Government to treat with unnecessary or vindictive severity “any of the misguided individual parties in this deplorable rebellion who have fallen into its hands in the regular course of the war, and that he should greatly rejoice if the effects of such sympathy could be extended to ministering to their mental ailment as well as their bodily suffering, thus contributing to put an end to a struggle which otherwise is too likely to be only procrastinated by their English sympathizers.” Mr. Seward replies as follows to the application received through Mr. Adams:

Department of State, Washington, December 5, 1864.

Sir:

I have received your dispatch of the 18th of November, No. 807, together with the papers therein mentioned, viz: a copy of a letter which was addressed to you on the 12th of November last by Lord Wharncliffe, and a copy of your answer to that letter. You will now inform Lord Wharncliffe that permission for an agent of the committee described by him to visit the insurgents detained in the military prisons of the United States and distribute among them seventeen thousand pounds of British gold is disallowed. Here it is expected that your correspondence with Lord Wharncliffe will end. That correspondence will necessarily become public.

On reading it, the American public will be well aware that while the United States have ample means for the support of prisoners as well as for every exigency of the war in which they are engaged, the insurgents who have rushed into that coalition are suffering no privations that appeal for relief to charity either at home or abroad. The American public will be likely to reflect that the sum thus insidiously tendered in the name of humanity constitutes no large portion of the profits which its contributors may be justly supposed to have derived from the insurgents by exchanging with them arms and munitions of war for the coveted productions of immoral and enervating slave labor.

The pending conflict (Entered . . . 1863 by Oliver Evans Woods . . . Pennsylvania. Herline & Hensel, Lith. 632 Chestnut St. Phila.; LOC: LC-USZ62-17728)

John Bull holding clubs for rebeldom

Nor will any portion of the American people be disposed to regard the sum thus ostentatiously offered for the relief of captured insurgents as a too generous equivalent for the devastation and dissolution which a civil war, promoted and protracted by British subjects, has spread throughout the States which before were eminently prosperous and happy. Finally, in view of this last officious intervention in our domestic affairs, the American people can hardly fail to recall the warning of the Father of our Country, directed against two great and intimately connected public dangers, namely, sectional faction and foreign intrigue.

I do not think the insurgents have become debased, although they have sadly wandered from the ways of loyalty and patriotism. I think that, in common with all our countrymen, they will rejoice in being saved by their considerate and loyal Government from the grave insult which Lord Wharncliffe and his associates, in their zeal for the overthrow of the United States, have prepared for the victims of this unnatural and hopeless rebellion.

I am, sir, your obedient servant,

William H. Seward.

You can read all about the The Confederate Bazaar at Liverpool at American Civil War Round Table UK and get another look at Mr. Seward’s letter to Charles Francis Adams at Google Books[1]. An explanation of the political cartoon appears at the Library of Congress

Secretary Seward had been dealing with the British throughout the war, as can be seen by this cartoon regarding the Trent Affair:

The great surrender America surrenders the great commissioners - England surrenders her great pretensions - Jeff. Davis surrenders his great expectations. (New-York : Published by E. Anthony, 501 Broadway, 1862.; LOC: LC-DIG-ppmsca-35499)

Trent Affair

Trent Affair

Trent Affair

  1. [1]McPherson, Edward The political history of the United States of America, during the great rebellion …. Philp & Solomons, 1865. Print. page 268.
Posted in 150 Years Ago This Week, Civil War prisons, Foreign Relations, Lincoln Administration | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment